+35.8%
LDOS vs EPAM
-42.9%
+78.6%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.6% | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +0.8% | -3.6% | -2.9% |
| 30D | +13.6% | +24.9% | -11.3% | +10.5% |
| 3M | +4.2% | +22.6% | -18.4% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -8.2% | +24.2% | -32.4% | -11.5% |
| YTD | -24.1% | -33.0% | +8.9% | -22.3% |
| 1Y | -31.2% | -13.3% | -17.9% | -31.2% |
| All | +35.8% | -42.9% | +78.6% | +36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling