-92.1%
LCID vs VOO
+79.1%
-171.2%
-92.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.8% | +0.5% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -34.2% | -0.9% | -33.3% | -33.1% |
| 3M | -9.1% | +3.9% | -13.0% | -14.2% |
| 6M | -52.6% | +14.5% | -67.1% | -61.4% |
| YTD | -56.2% | +13.0% | -69.1% | -63.3% |
| 1Y | -74.9% | +19.4% | -94.3% | -80.4% |
| 3Y | -92.1% | +78.9% | -170.9% | -96.9% |
| All | -92.1% | +79.1% | -171.2% | -96.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling