-90.8%
LCID vs RNG
+177.9%
-268.7%
-94.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +2.4% | -5.1% | -3.4% |
| 7D | +8.9% | -3.5% | +12.4% | +10.1% |
| 30D | +6.8% | -3.8% | +10.6% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -45.2% | +18.6% | -63.8% | -48.1% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +69.2% | -108.3% | -49.2% |
| YTD | -65.3% | +161.9% | -227.2% | -76.3% |
| 1Y | -78.4% | +176.2% | -254.6% | -85.6% |
| All | -90.8% | +177.9% | -268.7% | -94.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling