-80.7%
LCID vs PLTU
+154.0%
-234.8%
-86.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -9.0% | +10.8% | +3.0% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -13.6% | +7.0% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -30.1% | +16.7% | -46.8% | -32.4% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +29.6% | -47.2% | -23.7% |
| 6M | -54.4% | -0.1% | -54.3% | -56.7% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -31.5% | -24.2% | -56.2% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | -19.7% | -51.3% | -72.8% |
| All | -80.7% | +154.0% | -234.8% | -87.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling