-85.6%
LCID vs KRMN
+33.3%
-118.9%
-86.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.3% | +3.1% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -12.3% | +5.7% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -27.5% | -2.7% | -22.7% |
| 3M | -17.6% | -26.5% | +8.9% | -10.6% |
| 6M | -54.4% | -59.6% | +5.1% | -39.7% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -45.4% | -10.4% | -48.0% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | -25.1% | -45.9% | -69.4% |
| All | -85.6% | +33.3% | -118.9% | -86.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling