-98.7%
LCID vs FGI
-70.4%
-28.3%
-98.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +7.5% | -5.8% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -6.6% | +0.5% | -7.1% | -6.6% |
| 30D | -30.1% | +65.4% | -95.6% | -32.1% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +23.5% | -41.1% | -19.3% |
| 6M | -54.4% | +60.5% | -115.0% | -56.8% |
| YTD | -55.7% | +30.0% | -85.7% | -57.6% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | +82.1% | -153.1% | -73.9% |
| 3Y | -92.6% | -4.4% | -88.3% | -93.3% |
| All | -98.7% | -70.4% | -28.3% | -98.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling