-92.6%
LCID vs DAR
+6.3%
-98.9%
-92.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -0.9% | +2.6% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -6.6% | +1.4% | -7.9% | -7.2% |
| 30D | -30.1% | +12.8% | -42.9% | -33.9% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +7.4% | -25.0% | -20.8% |
| 6M | -54.4% | +22.3% | -76.7% | -58.8% |
| YTD | -55.7% | +81.1% | -136.8% | -66.3% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | +106.5% | -177.5% | -79.4% |
| All | -92.6% | +6.3% | -98.9% | -93.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling