-92.6%
LCID vs COO
-23.4%
-69.1%
-92.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.5% | +3.2% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -2.2% | -4.4% | -5.4% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -7.0% | -23.1% | -27.5% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +12.2% | -29.8% | -22.9% |
| 6M | -54.4% | -15.1% | -39.3% | -50.0% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -15.1% | -40.6% | -51.4% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | +2.3% | -73.4% | -71.3% |
| All | -92.6% | -23.4% | -69.1% | -93.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling