-92.7%
LCID vs BIIB
-19.0%
-73.7%
-92.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.8% | -0.8% | -6.9% | -7.3% |
| 7D | -9.3% | -5.4% | -4.0% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -35.4% | +1.7% | -37.1% | -36.2% |
| 3M | -17.1% | +5.8% | -22.9% | -19.1% |
| 6M | -58.9% | +11.9% | -70.9% | -61.4% |
| YTD | -59.6% | +19.7% | -79.3% | -63.7% |
| 1Y | -78.0% | +46.7% | -124.7% | -82.2% |
| All | -92.7% | -19.0% | -73.7% | -90.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling