-92.6%
LCID vs AMBA
-1.0%
-91.6%
-92.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMBA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -0.8% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -11.0% | +4.4% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -23.2% | -7.0% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -17.6% | -12.7% | -4.9% | -17.0% |
| 6M | -54.4% | +11.2% | -65.6% | -60.3% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -11.2% | -44.5% | -57.6% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | -22.5% | -48.5% | -71.2% |
| All | -92.6% | -1.0% | -91.6% | -93.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMBA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMBA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMBA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMBA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling