-40.7%
LBRT vs NIO
-62.1%
+21.5%
-66.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -13.7% | -3.0% | -10.7% | -13.4% |
| 7D | -34.8% | -3.6% | -31.2% | -34.6% |
| 30D | -43.6% | -8.0% | -35.5% | -43.1% |
| 3M | -41.2% | -31.2% | -10.1% | -39.1% |
| 6M | -66.1% | -45.8% | -20.3% | -64.1% |
| YTD | -37.9% | -37.3% | -0.6% | -35.6% |
| 1Y | -33.9% | -56.1% | +22.2% | -29.2% |
| All | -40.7% | -62.1% | +21.5% | -39.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling