-62.9%
LBRT vs ARMK
+15.0%
-77.9%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | +4.5% | +0.9% | +3.3% |
| 7D | -29.1% | -2.6% | -26.5% | -28.4% |
| 30D | -38.4% | -5.2% | -33.2% | -37.4% |
| 3M | -40.1% | -6.5% | -33.5% | -38.8% |
| 6M | -62.9% | +15.3% | -78.2% | -61.6% |
| All | -62.9% | +15.0% | -77.9% | -61.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling