-1.9%
KWEB vs ZM
+33.5%
-35.4%
-41.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -5.6% | -5.7% | +0.1% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -10.7% | -9.1% | -1.6% | -9.0% |
| 3M | -7.4% | +3.5% | -10.9% | -8.5% |
| 6M | -19.3% | +25.7% | -45.0% | -24.8% |
| YTD | -27.8% | +10.8% | -38.5% | -30.9% |
| 1Y | -35.9% | +12.8% | -48.7% | -39.2% |
| 3Y | -1.9% | +33.1% | -35.1% | -12.2% |
| All | -1.9% | +33.5% | -35.4% | -12.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling