+17.4%
KRMN vs BBIO
+124.3%
-106.9%
-70.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.1% | +2.7% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -11.8% | -3.2% | -8.5% | -10.7% |
| 30D | -43.0% | -13.6% | -29.4% | -39.7% |
| 3M | -28.8% | +7.2% | -36.1% | -31.5% |
| 6M | -66.3% | +1.5% | -67.8% | -66.8% |
| YTD | -51.8% | -5.3% | -46.5% | -51.7% |
| 1Y | -44.7% | +37.7% | -82.4% | -52.8% |
| All | +17.4% | +124.3% | -106.9% | -24.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling