+35.1%
KR vs UMAC
+473.8%
-438.6%
-26.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | -2.5% | +5.2% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -3.4% | +3.2% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -15.1% | +20.1% | +5.0% |
| 3M | -8.2% | -10.8% | +2.6% | -8.0% |
| 6M | -18.0% | +15.7% | -33.7% | -17.8% |
| YTD | -4.8% | +80.1% | -84.9% | -4.6% |
| 1Y | -11.0% | +116.7% | -127.7% | -11.0% |
| All | +35.1% | +473.8% | -438.6% | +33.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling