-23.1%
KMX vs ABCL
+104.5%
-127.6%
-65.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -1.2% | +2.2% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +11.7% | +93.1% | -81.4% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +34.9% | +79.4% | -44.5% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +50.3% | +214.9% | -164.6% | +20.5% |
| YTD | +63.8% | +234.2% | -170.4% | +28.4% |
| 1Y | +3.8% | +174.8% | -170.9% | -16.8% |
| All | -23.1% | +104.5% | -127.6% | -43.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling