+114.8%
KMI vs FCEL
-63.4%
+178.2%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FCEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -5.9% | +4.4% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +6.3% | -8.3% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -18.8% | +17.1% | -1.5% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -3.8% | +1.9% | -2.5% |
| 6M | -4.3% | +121.1% | -125.5% | -6.9% |
| YTD | +15.8% | +113.3% | -97.5% | +12.7% |
| 1Y | +17.6% | +173.5% | -155.9% | +13.5% |
| All | +114.8% | -63.4% | +178.2% | +115.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling