+3.7%
KMB vs NIO
-56.9%
+60.6%
-34.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -3.8% | +2.8% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +2.8% | +3.2% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +13.5% | -8.4% | +21.9% | +13.5% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -32.0% | +35.7% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +15.6% | -43.9% | +59.5% | +15.7% |
| YTD | +14.0% | -35.7% | +49.7% | +14.0% |
| 1Y | +12.9% | -51.1% | +64.1% | +13.1% |
| 3Y | +3.7% | -54.7% | +58.4% | +3.9% |
| All | +3.7% | -56.9% | +60.6% | +3.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling