+1.6%
KMB vs NIO
-59.9%
+61.5%
-34.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +5.9% | -7.8% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.5% | +5.6% | -5.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +12.4% | -4.2% | +16.6% | +12.4% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -26.3% | +27.3% | +1.0% |
| 6M | +12.1% | -42.5% | +54.7% | +12.3% |
| YTD | +11.6% | -33.5% | +45.1% | +11.6% |
| 1Y | +13.1% | -52.7% | +65.8% | +13.3% |
| 3Y | +1.6% | -57.5% | +59.0% | +1.5% |
| All | +1.6% | -59.9% | +61.5% | +1.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling