+279.1%
KLAC vs ZTS
-59.0%
+338.0%
-43.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -0.3% | -2.9% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +6.2% | -3.8% | +9.9% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -5.0% | -2.0% | -3.0% | -4.8% |
| 3M | -14.4% | -10.2% | -4.2% | -12.8% |
| 6M | +28.3% | -39.4% | +67.7% | +45.8% |
| YTD | +51.1% | -40.8% | +91.9% | +73.0% |
| 1Y | +100.4% | -50.1% | +150.5% | +142.4% |
| All | +279.1% | -59.0% | +338.0% | +371.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling