-100.0%
KIDZ vs VOO
+56.1%
-156.1%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | -0.3% | -7.0% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -21.4% | -0.6% | -20.8% | -18.7% |
| 30D | -45.7% | -3.6% | -42.1% | -37.6% |
| 3M | -81.1% | -2.7% | -78.4% | -79.0% |
| 6M | -98.8% | +2.2% | -101.1% | -98.9% |
| YTD | -99.9% | +10.9% | -110.8% | -99.9% |
| 1Y | -100.0% | +11.3% | -111.3% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +56.1% | -156.1% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling