-100.0%
KIDZ vs VOO
+59.8%
-159.8%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | -0.4% | -5.4% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -19.5% | +0.1% | -19.6% | -19.6% |
| 30D | -42.4% | +0.1% | -42.4% | -42.4% |
| 3M | -90.7% | +2.0% | -92.7% | -91.0% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +13.0% | -112.5% | -99.7% |
| YTD | -99.7% | +13.6% | -113.3% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -100.0% | +20.1% | -120.0% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +59.8% | -159.8% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling