+306.4%
KGC vs HTZ
-81.0%
+387.3%
-47.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -20.8% | +21.6% | +2.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -7.7% | +7.7% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -9.3% | -13.1% | +3.8% | -8.8% |
| 3M | -15.9% | +14.7% | -30.6% | -17.1% |
| 6M | -24.9% | -70.6% | +45.8% | -21.3% |
| YTD | -23.0% | -65.2% | +42.1% | -20.0% |
| 1Y | -9.9% | -73.2% | +63.2% | -6.0% |
| All | +306.4% | -81.0% | +387.3% | +343.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling