+29.1%
KDP vs NIO
-59.9%
+89.0%
-31.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +5.9% | -6.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +5.6% | -3.4% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +19.9% | -4.2% | +24.2% | +20.0% |
| 3M | +21.5% | -26.3% | +47.8% | +21.9% |
| 6M | +30.1% | -42.5% | +72.6% | +31.0% |
| YTD | +34.9% | -33.5% | +68.5% | +35.4% |
| 1Y | +43.4% | -52.7% | +96.0% | +44.8% |
| 3Y | +29.1% | -57.5% | +86.5% | +30.9% |
| All | +29.1% | -59.9% | +89.0% | +30.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling