+162.3%
JPM vs LPLA
+44.8%
+117.5%
-24.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -1.5% | +1.1% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -6.0% | +4.6% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +13.9% | +21.4% | -7.4% | +6.5% |
| 6M | +23.5% | +12.1% | +11.4% | +17.9% |
| YTD | +11.6% | -1.8% | +13.5% | +11.2% |
| 1Y | +21.4% | +3.2% | +18.2% | +18.1% |
| All | +162.3% | +44.8% | +117.5% | +131.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling