+177.0%
JBL vs HTZ
-86.4%
+263.5%
-36.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +1.3% | +0.2% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +7.5% | -4.5% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -8.3% | +47.4% | -55.7% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -16.9% | -54.9% | +38.0% | -14.2% |
| 6M | +21.8% | -47.0% | +68.8% | +24.3% |
| YTD | +36.3% | -55.3% | +91.6% | +40.3% |
| 1Y | +49.5% | -57.6% | +107.1% | +53.5% |
| All | +177.0% | -86.4% | +263.5% | +259.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling