+33.7%
JBHT vs NIO
-60.9%
+94.6%
-42.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +3.4% | -2.4% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -0.6% | +2.3% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -3.5% | +2.3% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -17.1% | -30.7% | +13.5% | -15.0% |
| 6M | -4.4% | -45.6% | +41.2% | -0.5% |
| YTD | +17.5% | -35.3% | +52.8% | +20.3% |
| 1Y | +32.6% | -53.9% | +86.5% | +39.4% |
| All | +33.7% | -60.9% | +94.6% | +39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling