+66.0%
IWM vs ZETA
+281.1%
-215.1%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.8% | +1.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -2.4% | +3.9% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -2.3% | +15.6% | -17.9% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +4.0% | +41.5% | -37.5% | -1.6% |
| 6M | +17.9% | +63.4% | -45.5% | +8.5% |
| YTD | +20.2% | +51.3% | -31.1% | +11.1% |
| 1Y | +25.0% | +65.8% | -40.8% | +13.1% |
| 3Y | +66.0% | +279.2% | -213.2% | +10.0% |
| All | +66.0% | +281.1% | -215.1% | +10.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling