+71.5%
IWM vs LNT
+65.0%
+6.5%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.3% | -0.4% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +1.6% | -1.3% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +0.6% | +12.1% | -11.5% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -6.2% | +8.2% | -14.4% | -8.2% |
| 6M | -0.8% | +3.6% | -4.4% | -2.0% |
| YTD | +14.8% | +16.2% | -1.4% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +16.1% | +12.8% | +3.4% | +11.3% |
| 3Y | +71.5% | +66.5% | +5.0% | +34.8% |
| All | +71.5% | +65.0% | +6.5% | +34.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling