+61.7%
IWM vs FLNC
-63.7%
+125.4%
-27.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -4.2% | +3.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -5.0% | +2.5% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -26.1% | +21.7% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +2.2% | -55.2% | +57.4% | +8.8% |
| 6M | +14.0% | -42.6% | +56.6% | +16.0% |
| YTD | +17.4% | -51.0% | +68.4% | +19.5% |
| 1Y | +22.9% | +43.3% | -20.4% | +9.1% |
| All | +61.7% | -63.7% | +125.4% | +51.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling