-2.8%
IWF vs NIO
-53.2%
+50.4%
-14.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -5.9% | +5.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -4.7% | +10.0% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -14.3% | +5.7% | -7.0% |
| 3M | -6.5% | -32.8% | +26.3% | -2.5% |
| 6M | -5.6% | -49.8% | +44.2% | +1.1% |
| YTD | -1.5% | -40.2% | +38.7% | +3.6% |
| 1Y | -2.8% | -52.7% | +49.9% | +5.5% |
| All | -2.8% | -53.2% | +50.4% | +5.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling