+77.5%
IWF vs ACGL
+34.2%
+43.2%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.7% | +1.7% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -0.7% | +1.3% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -1.0% | +0.6% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -2.6% | +11.0% | -13.7% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +9.1% | -0.3% | +9.5% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +4.5% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +3.9% |
| 1Y | +10.1% | +6.4% | +3.7% | +8.8% |
| All | +77.5% | +34.2% | +43.2% | +65.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling