+72.4%
IWD vs ABCL
+104.5%
-32.0%
-15.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.2% | +0.5% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +0.7% | -1.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +0.6% | +93.1% | -92.5% | -4.2% |
| 3M | +7.2% | +79.4% | -72.2% | +2.1% |
| 6M | +16.2% | +214.9% | -198.7% | +5.6% |
| YTD | +23.3% | +234.2% | -210.9% | +11.0% |
| 1Y | +29.6% | +174.8% | -145.2% | +17.6% |
| All | +72.4% | +104.5% | -32.0% | +50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling