+19.7%
ITW vs GLDM
+128.8%
-109.1%
-20.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.9% | +0.3% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -0.5% | -3.0% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -9.1% | +4.4% | -13.6% | -9.5% |
| 3M | +8.2% | -1.1% | +9.3% | +8.3% |
| 6M | -4.8% | -13.7% | +8.9% | -3.7% |
| YTD | +11.0% | +2.8% | +8.3% | +11.4% |
| 1Y | +4.2% | +24.8% | -20.6% | +3.4% |
| All | +19.7% | +128.8% | -109.1% | +12.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling