+56.7%
ITOT vs UMAC
+473.8%
-417.1%
-19.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -2.5% | +3.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -3.4% | +2.5% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -15.1% | +13.6% | -1.2% |
| 3M | +3.6% | -10.8% | +14.3% | +3.4% |
| 6M | +13.7% | +15.7% | -2.0% | +11.9% |
| YTD | +12.9% | +80.1% | -67.2% | +9.7% |
| 1Y | +17.2% | +116.7% | -99.5% | +13.0% |
| All | +56.7% | +473.8% | -417.1% | +46.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling