-51.6%
IT vs EPAM
-33.7%
-17.9%
-77.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.0% | -3.9% | -0.2% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -16.9% | +13.4% | -30.3% | -22.2% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +47.1% | -44.7% | -14.7% |
| 3M | +2.9% | +71.2% | -68.3% | -19.4% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +48.9% | -23.1% | +3.5% |
| YTD | -24.6% | -22.2% | -2.4% | -21.6% |
| 1Y | -16.0% | -5.2% | -10.9% | -17.7% |
| 3Y | -51.6% | -34.9% | -16.6% | -50.0% |
| All | -51.6% | -33.7% | -17.9% | -50.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling