+69.0%
ISRG vs HTZ
-81.0%
+149.9%
-45.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -20.8% | +18.0% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +4.4% | -7.7% | +12.1% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -13.1% | +28.9% | +16.2% |
| 3M | +24.9% | +14.7% | +10.1% | +23.9% |
| 6M | +3.8% | -70.6% | +74.4% | +6.8% |
| YTD | -17.3% | -65.2% | +47.9% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -14.6% | -73.2% | +58.6% | -12.3% |
| All | +69.0% | -81.0% | +149.9% | +77.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling