+27.6%
IR vs NIO
-59.9%
+87.4%
-36.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | +5.9% | -4.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | +5.6% | -1.9% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +7.4% | -4.2% | +11.7% | +7.7% |
| 3M | -5.9% | -26.3% | +20.4% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +5.6% | -42.5% | +48.1% | +9.5% |
| YTD | +4.8% | -33.5% | +38.4% | +7.0% |
| 1Y | +6.9% | -52.7% | +59.6% | +12.0% |
| 3Y | +27.6% | -57.5% | +85.0% | +28.6% |
| All | +27.6% | -59.9% | +87.4% | +28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling