+13.8%
IP vs ARMK
+83.8%
-69.9%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.0% | -3.9% | -0.1% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -10.2% | +5.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +6.5% | -9.3% | +15.8% | +9.5% |
| 3M | -18.0% | -11.4% | -6.6% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +10.3% | +11.6% | -1.3% | +6.0% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +37.5% | -47.4% | -19.1% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | +34.9% | -36.0% | -10.7% |
| All | +13.8% | +83.8% | -69.9% | +0.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling