-43.2%
IONQ vs ECHO
+30.7%
-73.9%
-63.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +23.4% | +5.2% | +18.2% | +20.1% |
| 7D | +8.6% | -2.4% | +11.0% | +10.8% |
| 30D | -21.1% | -3.1% | -18.0% | -19.3% |
| 3M | -17.9% | +8.7% | -26.6% | -21.5% |
| 6M | -37.9% | -24.8% | -13.2% | -30.2% |
| YTD | -27.3% | -13.0% | -14.3% | -24.2% |
| 1Y | -43.2% | +33.9% | -77.1% | -50.9% |
| All | -43.2% | +30.7% | -73.9% | -50.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling