+318.3%
INTC vs ECHO
+17.8%
+300.5%
-41.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +2.0% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -12.0% | -27.3% | +15.3% | -6.9% |
| 6M | +114.5% | -17.0% | +131.5% | +117.2% |
| YTD | +179.0% | -14.3% | +193.3% | +181.4% |
| 1Y | +318.3% | +20.9% | +297.4% | +280.2% |
| All | +318.3% | +17.8% | +300.5% | +280.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling