+75.3%
INSM vs PLTD
-77.8%
+153.1%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +4.6% | -5.0% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +6.5% | +5.9% | +0.6% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +27.5% | -11.6% | +39.1% | +26.3% |
| 3M | +20.4% | -29.9% | +50.3% | +17.8% |
| 6M | -15.7% | -28.5% | +12.8% | -16.8% |
| YTD | -27.4% | -20.4% | -7.0% | -27.1% |
| 1Y | -11.4% | -33.3% | +21.9% | -13.0% |
| All | +75.3% | -77.8% | +153.1% | +45.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling