-100.0%
INLF vs VOO
+31.7%
-131.7%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -0.5% | -2.5% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -9.0% | -0.4% | -8.6% | -8.6% |
| 30D | -36.4% | -1.4% | -35.1% | -35.3% |
| 3M | -99.6% | +3.7% | -103.3% | -99.6% |
| 6M | -99.7% | +13.0% | -112.7% | -99.7% |
| YTD | -99.8% | +12.4% | -112.2% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +18.6% | -118.5% | -99.9% |
| All | -100.0% | +31.7% | -131.7% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling