-12.4%
INFQ vs ABCL
+269.0%
-281.4%
-55.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.3% | +0.1% | +6.2% | +6.3% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +1.4% | +6.2% | +7.0% |
| 30D | +14.7% | +65.1% | -50.4% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -7.8% | +111.1% | -118.8% | -38.7% |
| 6M | +28.0% | +231.6% | -203.6% | -38.8% |
| All | -12.4% | +269.0% | -281.4% | -58.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling