-2.7%
INDA vs UMAC
+549.5%
-552.2%
-22.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +9.3% | -11.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +14.7% | -15.7% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -2.5% | -0.5% | -2.0% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +4.0% | +0.5% | +3.5% | +3.7% |
| 6M | -1.8% | +57.9% | -59.7% | -2.9% |
| YTD | -9.2% | +103.9% | -113.1% | -10.5% |
| 1Y | -7.2% | +159.3% | -166.5% | -9.0% |
| All | -2.7% | +549.5% | -552.2% | -8.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling