+110.8%
ILMN vs UMAC
+138.6%
-27.9%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -3.2% | +1.4% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -9.2% | -4.0% | -5.2% | -9.1% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -9.4% | +13.8% | +4.3% |
| 3M | +23.9% | +3.0% | +20.9% | +22.8% |
| 6M | +64.5% | +27.2% | +37.3% | +59.6% |
| YTD | +53.5% | +84.7% | -31.2% | +46.6% |
| 1Y | +110.8% | +136.5% | -25.7% | +86.1% |
| All | +110.8% | +138.6% | -27.9% | +86.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling