+76.6%
ILMN vs TRGP
+65.2%
+11.3%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +2.8% | -5.5% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -9.8% | -5.8% | -4.0% | -10.5% |
| 30D | -22.7% | -1.5% | -21.3% | -22.4% |
| 3M | +12.1% | +6.1% | +6.0% | +14.4% |
| 6M | +51.5% | +14.4% | +37.1% | +57.8% |
| YTD | +63.9% | +55.3% | +8.5% | +79.3% |
| 1Y | +76.6% | +69.1% | +7.4% | +87.3% |
| All | +76.6% | +65.2% | +11.3% | +87.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling