+129.3%
ILMN vs NIO
-60.1%
+189.5%
-54.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -4.9% | +3.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -14.5% | +11.6% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -23.8% | -15.0% | -8.9% | -22.1% |
| 3M | +7.5% | -35.6% | +43.0% | +13.5% |
| 6M | +42.8% | -55.7% | +98.4% | +57.6% |
| YTD | +57.8% | -43.1% | +101.0% | +66.9% |
| 1Y | +72.6% | -53.5% | +126.1% | +87.8% |
| 3Y | +129.3% | -59.8% | +189.2% | +141.9% |
| All | +129.3% | -60.1% | +189.5% | +141.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling