+108.7%
ILMN vs LNT
+9.7%
+99.0%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -1.1% | -1.8% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -3.9% | +0.2% | -4.0% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +6.9% | -0.5% | +7.4% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +28.1% | -5.5% | +33.6% | +28.3% |
| 6M | +65.0% | -3.8% | +68.8% | +65.6% |
| YTD | +56.3% | +6.8% | +49.5% | +61.0% |
| 1Y | +108.7% | +9.3% | +99.4% | +118.7% |
| All | +108.7% | +9.7% | +99.0% | +118.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling