+62.5%
ILMN vs FN
-52.5%
+115.0%
-22.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -6.0% | +1.1% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -21.6% | -7.0% | -14.6% | -21.5% |
| 30D | -22.9% | -24.7% | +1.9% | -23.2% |
| 3M | +11.6% | -35.7% | +47.3% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +62.5% | -52.4% | +115.0% | +65.8% |
| All | +62.5% | -52.5% | +115.0% | +65.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling