-51.4%
ILMN vs EPAM
-81.9%
+30.5%
-84.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.4% | +0.8% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +2.0% | -0.7% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +9.2% | +6.5% | +2.7% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +29.8% | +19.9% | +9.9% | +22.8% |
| 6M | +69.2% | -16.9% | +86.1% | +74.9% |
| YTD | +66.4% | -42.9% | +109.3% | +87.4% |
| 1Y | +123.4% | -30.4% | +153.8% | +138.3% |
| 3Y | +33.2% | -54.7% | +87.9% | +53.4% |
| All | -51.4% | -81.9% | +30.5% | -34.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling