+93.9%
ILMN vs EPAM
-15.2%
+109.1%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -0.6% | -4.3% | -4.9% |
| 7D | -21.6% | +0.8% | -22.4% | -21.7% |
| 30D | -22.9% | +24.9% | -47.8% | -24.8% |
| 3M | +11.6% | +22.6% | -11.0% | +8.6% |
| 6M | +62.5% | +24.2% | +38.4% | +58.2% |
| YTD | +72.7% | -33.0% | +105.7% | +87.6% |
| 1Y | +93.9% | -13.3% | +107.2% | +110.8% |
| All | +93.9% | -15.2% | +109.1% | +110.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling